Geomorphic changes of headwater systems 3–23 years after forest harvesting by clearcutting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forest harvesting directly affects headwater systems, causing changes in catchment hydrology and riparian habitats. We investigated geomorphological impacts of clearcut harvesting on headwater systems and their recovery in the boreal mixedwood forests of northwestern Ontario, Canada. We studied 30 headwater streams (width <3 m), 24 in previously clearcut sites and six in undisturbed mature forests as reference. Each sampled stream had two segments, i) in clearcut 10 m away from the cut edge and ii) in riparian buffer of the larger stream to which it flows. Using MANOVA and discriminant function analysis, we examined harvesting impacts on stream width, depth, number of stream channels, riparian width, ground exposure, canopy exposure and organic matter depths as disturbance index in clearcut chronosequence and reference forest. Among all these factors we found canopy exposure contributed most to the observed harvesting impacts, which remained significantly high up to 15 years after clearcutting compared to the reference forest. Stream width and number of stream channels were also significantly high in clearcut sites for up to three years after harvesting but the differences tapered within 10 years. Streams were shallower in recently harvested sites, a difference that remained detectable even 23 years after clearcutting. General impacts of harvesting adjacent to headwater streams and their riparian zones were detectable at least until 15 years after harvesting. Although it is likely that harvest related biophysical damage in the headwater systems have negative effects on the aquatic ecosystems of the larger streams no study in the boreal forests has yet evaluated this direct link. We argue that although protecting all small streams and their headwater system by buffers is not possible, biophysical damage during harvesting can be avoided by complying with guidelines that forbid harvesting equipments near waters edge and retaining residual vegetation along small streams.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".