Critical Time to Nucleation: Graphite and Silicon Nanoparticle Generation by Laser Ablation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Femtosecond laser ablation hydrodynamics has been analyzed numerically. The nucleation process of two materials (silicon and graphite) in an expanding plume produced by a femtosecond laser ablation is analyzed within the framework of the Zeldovich-Raizer theory (RZ theory). RZ theory is the most appropriate theory applicable to an expanding plume created by a femtosecond laser ablation and has been used to estimate the critical times in the evolution of nanoparticle formation. However, there is no experimental result to directly substantiate the theoretical model on a fundamental level. This paper gives an experimental approach to prove theoretical predictions of critical times to nucleation in laser-ablated graphite and silicon plumes. The critical time to nucleation deduced using the RZ theory was found to be in close agreement with pulse frequency at which fibrous nanoparticle aggregates start to form for both materials. We experimentally showed that the nanoparticle aggregates were produced consistently when the pulse frequency corresponding to the femtosecond laser time interval was shorter than the critical time to begin nucleation. Therefore the nucleation time acts as a threshold time length to begin nucleation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".