Kinetics and Mechanism Investigation of the Reaction between Triphenylphosphine, Di‐<i>tert</i>‐butyl Acetylenedicarboxilate and OH‐Acid
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Kinetic studies were made for the reaction between triphenylphosphine, di‐ tert ‐butyl acetylenedicarboxilate in the presence of OH‐acid, such as 2‐hydroxy‐4‐methoxybenzaldehyde. To determine the kinetic parameters of the reaction, it was monitored by UV spectrophotometery. The second order fits were automatically drawn by the software associated with a Cary UV spectrophotometer model Bio‐300 at appropriate wavelength. The values of the second order rate constant ( k 2 ) were calculated using standard equations within the program. At the temperature range studied the dependence of the second order rate constant (ln k 2 ) on reciprocal temperature was in a good agreement with Arrhenius equation. This provided the relevant plots to calculate the activation energy of the reaction. Furthermore useful information was obtained from studies of the effect of solvent and concentration of reactants on the rate of reaction. Proposed mechanism was confirmed according to the obtained results and steady state approximation and first step ( k 2 ) of reaction was recognized as a rate‐determining step on the basis of experimental data. In addition, assignment of more stable isomers ( Z or E ) was investigated using the theoretical study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it