MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012702304 · doi:10.1115/gt2010-23214

Lean Premixed Turbulent Flame Front Structure and Implications for Modeling

2010· article· en· W2012702304 on OpenAlexafffund
Frank T. C. Yuen, O ̈mer L. Gu ̈lder

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 2: Combustion, Fuels and Emissions, Parts A and B · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPremixed flameTurbulenceDiffusion flameLaminar flame speedCombustionBunsen burnerMechanicsFlame structureCombustorMaterials scienceParticle image velocimetryFlame speedJet (fluid)PropaneCurvatureThermodynamicsChemistryPhysicsGeometryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Premixed turbulent flames of methane-air and propane-air stabilized on a Bunsen type burner were studied to investigate the structure of the flame front at a wide range of turbulence intensities covering the range of interest in lean premixed combustors. The flame front data were obtained using planar Rayleigh imaging, and particle image velocimetry was used to measure instantaneous velocity field for the experimental conditions studied. The fuel-air equivalence ratio range was from lean 0.6 to stoichiometric for methane flames, and from 0.7 to stoichiometric for propane flames. The non-dimensional turbulent rms velocity, u′/SL, covered a range from 3 to 24. Flame front thickness and flame front curvature statistics were obtained from 2D measurements. Flame front thickness increased slightly with increasing non-dimensional turbulence rms velocity in both methane and propane flames, although the flame thickening was more prominent in propane flames. There was not any significant difference in flame thickening whether the flame thickness is evaluated at progress variable 0.5, corresponding to the reaction zone, or 0.3, corresponding to the preheat zone. Variations of front curvature and flame thickness are presented for different premixed combustion regimes and implications of these findings for modelling premixed turbulent combustion are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 2: Combustion, Fuels and Emissions, Parts A and BSame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207