MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013037289 · doi:10.1332/174426408x366667

Imbalances in funding for clinical and public health research in the UK: can NICE research recommendations make a difference?

2008· article· en· W2013037289 on OpenAlexaff
Kalipso Chalkidou, Anthony J. Culyer, Peter Littlejohns, Nick Doyle, Andrew Hoy

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence & Policy · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFonds National de la Recherche LuxembourgNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsNiceExcellencePublic healthHealth promotionPublic relationsMedicineEquity (law)Political sciencePopulation healthPopulationHealth policyEconomic growthNursingEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommendations for further research often focus on access, prevention and health promotion, and include population groups traditionally excluded from clinical trials, such as children and minority ethnic groups. NICE and its advisory bodies are starting to work with the National Institute for Health Research to promote research into the clinical and cost-effectiveness of public health interventions. More streamlined interaction between public funders and policy makers could help drive public R&D (Research & Development) investment towards under-researched areas such as prevention, equity and access, and strengthen the evidence base that underpins NICE guidance and broader clinical and public health practice in the UK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.039
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.528
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0390.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.892
GPT teacher head0.716
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvidence & PolicySame topicPrimary Care and Health OutcomesFrench-language works237,207