Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Abstract
Analogous to checklists of recommendations such as the CONSORT statement (for randomized trials), or the QUORUM statement (for systematic reviews), which are designed to ensure the quality of reports in the medical literature, a checklist of recommendations for authors is being presented by the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) in an effort to ensure complete descriptions of Web-based surveys. Papers on Web-based surveys reported according to the CHERRIES statement will give readers a better understanding of the sample (self-)selection and its possible differences from a "representative" sample. It is hoped that author adherence to the checklist will increase the usefulness of such reports.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Topic
- Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Field
- Social Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- JMIR PublicationsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- ChecklistThe InternetConsolidated Standards of Reporting TrialsSample (material)Quality (philosophy)Web applicationWorld Wide WebMEDLINEPsychologyMedical educationMedicineRandomized controlled trialComputer sciencePolitical science
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes