Sex and age differences in the pharmacokinetics of alosetron
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: To determine the effects of sex and age on the pharmacokinetics of alosetron. METHODS: Single oral and intravenous 2 mg doses of alosetron were administered on separate occasions to 48 healthy, young and elderly, males and females. Serum was sampled for 12 h post-dose to measure alosetron concentrations. RESULTS: Serum concentrations of alosetron were higher in females than in males, resulting from a sex difference in clearance by metabolism. Mean clearance values were 504 vs 677 ml min(-1) in young females vs males (mean ratio 0.75), and 461 vs 670 ml min(-1) in elderly females vs males (mean ratio 0.69). The sex difference in alosetron pharmacokinetics achieved statistical significance in the elderly, but not in the young. Irrespective of sex, alosetron clearance was increased by smoking. Serum concentrations tended to be higher in the elderly, although the effect of age was generally not significant. Volume of distribution was smaller in females (approximately 63 l) compared with males (approximately 84 l), regardless of age or the sex difference in body weight. CONCLUSIONS: A significant difference in clearance by metabolism of alosetron between the sexes, and possibly between the young and elderly was observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".