1‐Pyrenemethanol, a Useful Fluorometric Reagent for the Detection and Determination of Carboxylic Acids in Atmospheric Samples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A rapid fluorometric procedure for the selective and sensitive determination of carboxylic acids, based on pre‐column derivatization using 1‐pyrenemethanol, was optimized and applied to atmospheric sampling. The optimum conditions for derivatization were determined to be: reaction solvent–dichloromethane, temperature −44°C, reaction time −30 min, and reagent/total acid ratio −15. Separation of the derivatives of acids up to twenty carbons by reversed‐phase (C8) chromatography was achieved in 25 min using a water/acetonitrile gradient with a limit of detection for the derivatives of 20 pg for a 20 µL injection. A scanning detector with good spectral resolution allows qualitative identification of the components in complex samples. When used in atmospheric analysis, the recoveries of carboxylic acids from spiked samples were >80% with repeatabilities below 10% RSD. Low molecular weight acids were encountered predominantly in the vapor phase (0.20 to 92 ng/m3), whereas higher molecular weight acids were found mostly in particulate form (0.15–129 ng/m3).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".