STOCHASTICS OF ORDER n IN BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS: APPLICATIONS TO POPULATION DYNAMICS, THERMODYNAMICS, NONEQUILIBRIUM PHASE AND COMPLEXITY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present paper, a modeling in the complex space is combined with complex-valued fractional Brownian motion to get some new results in biological systems. The rational of this approach is as follows. Biological dynamics which evolve continuously in time but are not time differentiable, necessarily exhibit random properties. These random features appear also as a result of the randomness of the proper time of biological systems. Usually, this is taken into account by using white noises that is to say fractals of order two. Fractals of order n larger than two are more suitable for increments with large amplitudes, and they may be introduced by using either real-valued fractal noises with long range memory or Brownian motions with independent increments, which are necessarily complex-valued. In the later case, we are then led to describe biological systems in the complex plane. After some background on the complex-valued fractional Brownian motion, we shall deal successively with population growth, information thermodynamics of order n, nonequilibrium phase transition via fractal noises and complexity of Markovian processes via the concept of informational divergence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".