MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2015072291 · doi:10.2118/170034-ms

Alteration of matrix wettability during alternate injection of hot-water/solvent into heavy-oil containing fractured reservoirs

2014· article· en· W2015072291 on OpenAlex
M. Almojtaba Mohammed, Tayfun Babadagli

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImbibitionWettingSolventEnhanced oil recoveryOil in placeDiluentWater injection (oil production)Steam-assisted gravity drainageChemical engineeringCapillary actionPetroleum engineeringChemistrySteam injectionMaterials scienceGeologyPetroleumComposite materialOil sandsAsphaltOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An alternate injection of solvent and hot water/steam called Steam-Over-Solvent injection in Facture Reservoirs (SOS-FR) has been recently suggested and tested by our research group. In this process, most oil is produced during the solvent phase and then hot water/steam phase is assigned, mainly to retrieve the solvent. Oil recovery during this phase is typically low due to limited thermal expansion in the case of oil-wet matrix, and because capillary imbibition and gravity drainage driven by viscosity reduction do not have a significant contribution to the recovery. Wettability alteration toward more water-wet state will, however, enhance these mechanisms. Based on these facts, different wettability alteration agents were tested including cationic and anionic surfactants, ionic liquids, nano-fluids, high pH solutions, and low salinity water. The potential of these materials to modify the wettability of aged sandstone and limestone samples was evaluated using imbibition tests. Berea sandstone (aged to be oil-wet) and Indiana limestone samples were saturated with heavy oil (3, 600 cp). After the wettability modification was confirmed using different tests, the SOS-FR method was applied. The process was initiated by soaking cores into solvent (heptane or diluent oil) and the oil recovery was estimated using refractive index measurements. Then, two different experimental schemes were followed. In this first scheme, different brines were used and the oil production readings were taken periodically. These experiments will yield additional oil recovery (and solvent retrieval) by capillary imbibition and enhance gravity drainage if the wettability alteration due to solvent effect in the previous phase and chemical injected in the subsequent phase was achieved. In the second scheme, the heptane was retrieved first by hot-water exposure and the capillary imbibition tests were performed to test the selected chemical additive solutions as the wettability alteration agents. After conducting a total of 28 experiments, the most promising wettability alteration agents were marked and optimal application conditions (i.e., temperatures, injection sequence) were identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it