Isolation of the <i>topB</i> gene encoding DNA topoisomerase III as a multicopy suppressor of <i>topA</i> null mutations in <i>Escherichia coli</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One major function of DNA topoisomerase I in Escherichia coli is to repress R-loop formation during transcription elongation, which may otherwise inhibit cell growth. We have previously shown that the growth problems of topA mutants can be corrected by overproducing RNase H, an enzyme that degrades the RNA moiety of an R-loop. The goal of the present study was to identify other potential regulators of R-loop formation. To this end, we have screened for multicopy suppressors of topA null mutations. As expected using this procedure, we cloned the rnhA gene encoding RNase H. In addition, we also identified the topB gene encoding DNA topoisomerase III as an efficient suppressor of topA null mutations and, hence, of R-loop formation. We show that DNA topoisomerase III is able to relax transcription-induced negative supercoiling both in vitro and in vivo. An R-loop is also shown to be a hot-spot for relaxation by DNA topoisomerase III, and we found that R-loop-dependent hypernegative supercoiling can be prevented by the activity of this topoisomerase in vivo. It is also shown that the topB gene can act synergistically with the rnhA gene to correct the growth defect of topA null mutants efficiently. This synergistic effect can be explained by the fact that some R-loops must not be degraded in order for the RNA to be available for protein synthesis. Topoisomerase III can presumably repress the formation of such R-loops or cause their destabilization to prevent RNA degradation. This is supported by the fact that overproduction of this topoisomerase corrects the negative effect of overexpressing RNase H activity on the growth of topA null mutants at low temperatures. Moreover, the fact that DNA topoisomerase III does not relax global supercoiling supports our previous conclusion that R-loop formation, and therefore the essential function of DNA topoisomerase I, involves local, rather than global, supercoiling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".