Cyto-evolution of <i>Boronia</i> genomes revealed by fluorescent in situ hybridization with rDNA probes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The physical location of the 25S-26S rDNA sequences was examined in 11 taxa of nine species of Boronia. In diploid species, two rDNA sites were detected in Boronia clavata (2n = 14), Boronia pinnata 'White' (2n = 22), and Boronia chartacea (2n = 32); four in Boronia megastigma (2n = 14) and Boronia denticulata (2n = 18); six in Boronia pinnata 'Pink' (2n = 22); and eight in Boronia molloyae (2n = 16). Eleven sites were found in Boronia heterophylla 'Red' and 'Near White' (2n = 15), but only two active nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) were observed. In polyploid species, Boronia pilosa (2n = 44) had four rDNA sites, while Boronia coerulescens (2n = 72) had six. Most of the rDNA sequences were terminal, but a few were interstitial. There were also differences in signal intensity indicating that the gene copies between and within rDNA sites might be different. The result suggests that considerable chromosome rearrangements have occurred during Boronia cyto-evolution, leading to variation among Boronia taxa in rDNA copy number, site number, and location. These changes together with dysploid reduction during cyto-evolution have made the Boronia genome considerably diverse in chromosome number, genome organization, and chromosome structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".