Recovery of Oligomers and Cooperativity When Monomers of the M<sub>2</sub>Muscarinic Cholinergic Receptor Are Reconstituted into Phospholipid Vesicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FLAG- and HA-tagged M2 muscarinic receptors from coinfected Sf9 cells have been purified in digitonin-cholate and reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles. The purified receptor was predominantly monomeric: it showed no detectable coimmunoprecipitation; it migrated as a monomer during electrophoresis before or after cross-linking with bis(sulfosuccinimidyl)suberate; and it bound agonists and antagonists in a manner indicative of identical and mutually independent sites. Receptor cross-linked after reconstitution or after reconstitution and subsequent solubilization in digitonin-cholate migrated almost exclusively as a tetramer. The binding properties of the reconstituted receptor mimicked those reported previously for cardiac muscarinic receptors. The apparent capacity for N-[3H]methylscopolamine (NMS) was only 60% of that for [3H]quinuclidinylbenzilate (QNB), yet binding at saturating concentrations of [3H]QNB was inhibited fully and in a noncompetitive manner at comparatively low concentrations of unlabeled NMS. Reconstitution of the receptor with a saturating quantity of functional G proteins led to the appearance of three classes of sites for the agonist oxotremorine-M in assays with [3H]QNB; GMP-PNP caused an apparent interconversion from highest to lowest affinity and the concomitant emergence of a fourth class of intermediate affinity. All of the data can be described quantitatively in terms of cooperativity among four interacting sites, presumably within a tetramer; the effect of GMP-PNP can be accommodated as a shift in the distribution of tetramers between two states that differ in their cooperative properties. Monomers of the M2 receptor therefore can be assembled into tetramers with binding properties that closely resemble those of the muscarinic receptor in myocardial preparations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".