MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017055835 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m212474200

Adenine Release Is Fast in MutY-catalyzed Hydrolysis of G:A and 8-Oxo-G:A DNA Mismatches

2003· article· en· W2017055835 on OpenAlexaff
Joe A. B. McCann, Paul J. Berti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDNAChemistryAP siteBiochemistryDNA glycosylaseDNA repairBiophysicsStereochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MutY, a DNA repair enzyme, is unusual in that it binds exceedingly tightly to its products after the chemical steps of catalysis. Until now it was not known whether the product being released in the rate-limiting step was DNA, adenine, or both. MutY hydrolyzes adenine from 8-oxo-G:A (OG:A) base pair mismatches as the first step in the base excision repair pathway, as well as from G:A mismatches. The products are adenine and DNA containing an apurinic (AP) site. Tight product binding may have a physiological role in preventing further damage at the OG:AP site. We developed a rate assay using [8-14C]adenine in OG:A or G:A mismatches that distinguishes between adenine hydrolysis and adenine release. [8-14C]Adenine was released quickly from the MutY.AP-DNA.[8-14C]adenine complex, with a rate constant greater than 5 min-1. This was much faster than the rate-limiting step, at 0.006-0.015 min-1. Gel retardation experiments showed that AP-DNA release was very slow, consistent with it being the rate-limiting step. Thus, the kinetic mechanism involves fast adenine release after hydrolysis followed by rate-limiting AP-DNA release. Adenine appears to be buried deep in the protein.DNA interface, but there is enough flexibility or open space for it to dissociate from the MutY.APDNA.adenine complex. These results have implications for the catalytic mechanism of MutY.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207