Retrotransposon-based markers from potato monoploids used in somatic hybridization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an attempt to remove lethal and deleterious genes and enhance the heterozygosity of the potato genome, we developed several diverse somatic hybrids through the electrofusion of selected monoploids. Somatic hybrids and somaclones resulting from fused and unfused protoplasts, respectively, were verified with microsatellites. Molecular markers anchored in the Tst1 retrotransposon were used to examine polymorphisms in the regenerated plants and to reveal any somaclonal variation. Inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphism (IRAP) and retrotransposon display (sequence-specific amplified polymorphism (S-SAP), anchored in a retransposon) were examined on an ALFexpress DNA sequencer. Because of inconsistencies in the number and quality of bands revealed by the combination of either class of marker in combination with the ALFexpress, we cloned and sequenced 11 S-SAP bands to use as restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) probes in Southern blot analyses of genetic relationships in our potato populations and among related Solanaceae. Readily scorable bands (n = 27) that separated somatic hybrids from parental monoploids and somaclones and grouped monoploids according to known genetic relationships were produced. Some of the probes could be used to differentiate tomato and Datura from potato. Sequence analysis of 5 cloned IRAP and 11 cloned S-SAP markers confirmed that they were anchored in the Tst1 retrotransposon. BLAST searches within GenBank produced 10 highly significant hits (5 nucleotide, 4 expressed sequence tag (EST), and 1 protein) within closely related Solanaceae, suggesting that Tst1 represents an old retroelement that was inserted before the diversion of genera within Solanaceae; however, most sequences were undescribed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".