Clinical and immunological impact of HIV envelope V3 sequence variation after starting initial triple antiretroviral therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The HIV-1 envelope third variable loop (V3 loop) is an important determinant of viral phenotype and co-receptor usage. We wished to determine the impact of specific V3 genotypes associated with viral phenotype and co-receptor usage on response to initial triple antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: Pre-therapy plasma samples from the HOMER cohort of 1191 antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected adults who initiated triple therapy in British Columbia, Canada between August 1996 and September 1999 were genotyped for V3 loop sequence. V3 sequences were dichotomized by the presence or absence of positively charged residues at codons 11 and/or 25 (an '11/25' genotype). Neural network (NN) and Position Specific Scoring Matrix (PSSM) approaches were used as alternative V3 sequence interpretation methods. The association of V3 genotypes with clinical endpoints was assessed over a median of 43 months of follow up. RESULTS: One-hundred and eighteen (10.9%) of the 1085 isolates successfully genotyped for V3 displayed the 11/25 genotype. In multivariate analyses, this genotype was associated with a more rapid CD4 decline [risk ratio, (RR), 1.38; P = 0.012] and earlier mortality (RR, 1.70; P = 0.027), despite comparable viral load suppression below 500 HIV RNA copies/ml. We observed no influence of the 11/25 genotype on time to viral rebound or the development of drug resistance. PSSM-based sequence categories were similarly predictive of outcomes. NN sequence categories were not associated with any endpoints. CONCLUSION: The 11/25 genotype of the HIV V3 loop is an independent predictor of poor immunological response and more rapid mortality even after starting triple antiretroviral therapy. These results may prove to be useful for the clinical management of HIV-infected individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".