Cloning and characterization of resistance gene analogs from <i>Avena</i> species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sequences analogous to plant resistance genes of the NBS-LRR class were cloned from the genomic DNA of 11 Avena species with different genomes and levels of ploidy. Three pairs of degenerate primers were used, based on conserved DNA sequence motifs belonging to the NBS domain, and 33 sequences were identified. These were subdivided into 7 classes depending on nucleotide sequence identity. Despite the high level of degeneracy, the primers behaved in a highly selective way; the majority of sequences from the different species obtained with every primer combination showed strong identity and were considered homologous. For most species, only one sequence of each class was identified in each genome, suggesting that duplicated sequences are fairly divergent. The strong identity among specific NBS sequences precludes any conclusions being made on the evolution of these species. The genomic organization of the RGA sequences was explored using those of A. strigosa as probes in Southern blots involving digested DNA from 15 Avena species. The hybridization patterns showed wide diversity both among sequences within a species and among species for each sequence. However, the dendrogram generated using the RFLPs showed relationships among species to be in good agreement with those previously established using other molecular markers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".