MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Accuracy of Bayley Scores as Outcome Measures in Trials of Neonatal Therapies

2014· article· en· W2018979610 on OpenAlexafffund
Lorrie Costantini, Judy D’Ilario, Diane Moddemann, Karen Penner, Barbara Schmidt

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Pediatrics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfant Development and Preterm Care
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaManitoba HealthMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchNational Institutes of HealthVanderbilt University
KeywordsMedicineBayley Scales of Infant DevelopmentOutcome (game theory)PediatricsMEDLINEIntensive care medicinePsychiatryCognitionPsychomotor learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

national multicenter trial.Errors were detected and corrected in real time by comprehensive and rigorous central source document verification.The use of computer-assisted scoring software may reduce calculation and table look-up errors but cannot correct the effects of administrative or clerical errors that are made before data are entered into the program.Conclusions | This study underscores the importance of diligent administration and recording of psychometric assessments.We recommend central source document verification of all psychometric tests that contribute to the primary outcome in large multicenter trials of perinatal and neonatal therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.581
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.762
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.5810.762
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA PediatricsSame topicInfant Development and Preterm CareFrench-language works237,207