MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019694229 · doi:10.4271/2015-01-0803

Combustion and Exhaust Gas Speciation Analysis of Diesel and Butanol Post Injection

2015· article· en· W2019694229 on OpenAlex
Marko Jeftić, Jimi Tjong, Graham T. Reader, Meiping Wang, Ming Zheng

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCombustionn-ButanolDiesel exhaustExhaust gasExhaust gas recirculationButanolDiesel fuelEnvironmental scienceAutomotive engineeringPetroleum engineeringWaste managementChemistryEngineeringPhysical chemistryEthanolOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Experimental testing was done with a modern compression ignition engine to study the effect of the engine load and the effect of different fuels on the post injection characteristics. Two different fuels were utilized; ultra-low sulphur diesel and n-butanol. The results showed that a post injection can be an effective method for increasing the operating range of the engine load. Engine operation at high load can be limited by the peak cylinder pressure but the test results showed that an early post injection can increase the engine load without increasing the peak in-cylinder pressure. Neat butanol combustion may have a very high peak in-cylinder pressure and a very high peak pressure rise rate even at low load conditions. The test results showed that a butanol post injection can contribute to engine power without significantly affecting the peak pressure rise rate and the peak in-cylinder pressure. The test results indicated that high load conditions were more favourable for the combustion of delayed post injections. For diesel fuel post injection with exhaust gas recirculation, the earliest post injection timing was limited by high smoke emissions but this was not the case for butanol. However, the delayed post injections with butanol fuel were limited by the loss of ignition of the butanol post injection. An early post injection reduced the exhaust carbon monoxide emissions for the neat butanol tests but not for the diesel fuel tests. The hydrocarbon speciation analysis indicated that the butanol post injection tended to produce mostly formaldehyde, ethane, and unburned butanol hydrocarbons and that there were no detectable quantities of hydrogen, methane, ethylene, and propylene at these test conditions. It was found that the formation of these latter species was sensitive to the post injection timing when diesel fuel was used with reduced intake oxygen.</div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it