MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2021134037 · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2013.02.029

Lost in translation: A cautionary note about presentation of non-English measures in English-language journals

2013· letter· en· W2021134037 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christine T. Chambers, Kathryn A. Birnie

Bibliographic record

VenuePain · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Sciences Research and Education
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)English languagePsychologyHistoryMedicineLinguisticsMathematics educationSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dalhousie University & IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada E-mail address:[email protected] Article history: Received 25 January 2013; Accepted 21 February 2013.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.078
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.387
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0780.387
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.013
Scholarly communication0.0100.013
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0290.039
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePainSame topicHealth Sciences Research and EducationFrench-language works237,207