Enhancing the Photochemical Stability of <i>N</i>,<i>C</i>-Chelate Boryl Compounds: C−C Bond Formation versus C═C Bond <i>cis,trans</i>-Isomerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
N,C-chelate boron compounds such as B(ppy)Mes(2) (ppy = 2-phenylpyridyl, Mes = mesityl) have been recently shown to undergo a facile and reversible C-C/C-B bond rearrangement upon irradiation with UV-light, quenching the emission of the sample and limiting their use in optoelectronic devices. To address this problem, four molecules have been synthesized in which the pi-conjugation is extended using either vinyl or acetylene linkers. These compounds, (ph-C[triple bond]C-ppy)BMes(2) (B1A), (ph-CH=CH-ppy)BMes(2) (B1), [p-bis(ppy-CH=CH)benzene](BMes(2))(2) (B2), and [1,3,5-tris(ppy-CH=CH)benzene](BMes(2))(3) (B3) have been fully characterized by NMR and single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. All four compounds are light yellow and emit blue or blue-green light upon UV irradiation. The acetylene compound B1A has been found to exhibit photochemical instability the same as that of the parent chromophore B(ppy)Mes(2). In contrast, all of the olefin-substituted compounds are photochemically stable, instead undergoing cis-trans isomerization exclusively upon exposure to UV light. Experimental and TD-DFT computational results establish that the presence of the olefinic bond in B1-B3 provides an alternate energy dissipation pathway for the B(ppy)Mes(2) chromophore, stabilizing the molecule toward photochromic switching via cis-trans isomerization. Furthermore, the incorporation of a cis-trans isomerization pathway may prove to be a useful strategy for the stabilization of photochemically unstable chromophores in other pi-systems as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".