Energetics and Specificity of Interactions within Ub·Uev·Ubc13 Human Ubiquitin Conjugation Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lys(63)-linked polyubiquitin (poly-Ub) chains appear to play a nondegradative signaling and/or recruitment role in a variety of key eukaryotic cellular processes, including NF-kappaB signal transduction and DNA repair. A protein heterodimer composed of a catalytically active ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (Ubc13) and its homologue (Mms2 or Uev1a) forms a catalytic scaffold upon which a noncovalently associated acceptor Ub and thiolester-linked donor Ub are oriented such that Lys(63)-linked poly-Ub chain synthesis is facilitated. In this study, we have used (1)H-(15)N nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, in combination with isothermal titration calorimetry, to determine the thermodynamics and kinetics of the interactions between various components of the Lys(63)-linked poly-Ub conjugation machinery. Mms2 and Uev1a interact in vitro with acceptor Ub to form 1/1 complexes with macroscopic dissociation constants of 98 +/- 15 and 213 +/- 14 microM, respectively, and appear to bind Ub in a similar fashion. Interestingly, the Mms2.Ubc13 heterodimer associates with acceptor Ub in a 1/1 complex and binds with a dissociation constant of 28 +/- 6 microM, significantly stronger than the binding of Mms2 alone. Furthermore, a dissociation constant of 49 +/- 7 nM was determined for the interaction between Mms2 and Ubc13 using isothermal titration calorimetry. In connection with previous structural studies for this system, the thermodynamics and kinetics of acceptor Ub binding to the Mms2.Ubc13 heterodimer described in detail in this study will allow for a more thorough rationalization of the mechanism of formation of Lys(63)-linked poly-Ub chains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".