Exploitation of<i>Arabidopsis</i>-tomato synteny to construct a high-resolution map of the<i>ovate</i>-containing region in tomato chromosome 2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-resolution genetic and physical maps were constructed for the region of chromosome 2 containing the major fruit-shape locus ovate. A total of 3,000 NIL F2 and F3 NILs derived from Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Yellow Pear (TA503) x L. pennellii (a wild tomato) were used to position ovate adjacent to the marker TG645 and flanked by markers TX700 and BA10R (a 0.03-cM interval). BAC libraries and a BIBAC library were screened with the closest marker, TG645. Genetic mapping with the ends of isolated BAC clones revealed that two BAC clones (100 and 140 kb) both contained the ovate locus. Screening of sequences from these BAC clones revealed synteny between this segment of tomato chromosome 2 and the chromosome-4 region of Arabidopsis containing the BAC clone ATAP22. Microsynteny between the two genomes was exploited to find additional markers near the ovate locus. The placement of ovate on a BAC clone will now allow cloning of this locus and, hence, may open the door to understanding the molecular basis of fruit development and also facilitate the genetic engineering of fruit-shape characteristics. This also represents the first time that microsynteny with Arabidopsis has been exploited for positional cloning purposes in a different plant family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".