Concerning the Hydrolytic Stability of 8-Aryl-2′-deoxyguanosine Nucleoside Adducts: Implications for Abasic Site Formation at Physiological pH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Direct addition of aryl radical species to the C(8)-site of 2'-deoxyguanosine (dG) affords C(8)-aryl-dG adducts that are produced by carcinogenic arylhydrazines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and certain phenolic toxins. A common property of C(8)-arylpurine adduction is the accompaniment of abasic site formation. To determine how the C(8)-aryl moiety contributes to sugar loss, UV-vis spectroscopy has been employed to determine N(7) pK(a1) values and hydrolysis kinetics, while density functional theory (DFT) calculations have been utilized to probe the structural features and stability of the C(8)-aryl-dG adducts bearing different para and ortho substituents. In all cases, the C(8)-aryl-dG adducts adopt a syn conformation containing a strong O(5)'-H...N(3) hydrogen bond with the aryl ring twisted with respect to the nucleobase. The adducts undergo N(7)-protonation with ionization constants and calculated N(7) proton affinity (PA) values similar to those measured for dG. The hydrolysis kinetics shows that C(8)-aryl-dG nucleoside adducts are more prone than dG to acid-catalyzed hydrolysis, with those bearing para substituents having k(1) values that are ca. 90- to 200-fold larger than k(1) for dG, while the effects for the ortho adducts are only ca. 9- to 60-fold larger. Changes in the rate of hydrolysis are further explained by calculations showing that glycosidic bond cleavage in the syn orientation of both neutral and N(7)-protonated dG has a lower barrier than the anti orientation, and the bulky (phenyl) group further decreases the barrier. Despite adduct reactivity in acidic media, all adducts are relatively stable at physiological pH with t(1/2) approximately 25 days, suggesting that they are unlikely intermediates leading to abasic site formation at physiological pH. This information has allowed development of a new rationale for the tendency of abasic site formation to accompany C(8)-arylpurine adduction within duplex DNA at neutral pH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".