Observation of multiple isoforms and specific proteolysis patterns of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in the context of cell cycle compartments and sample preparations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is an essential component for eukaryotic chromosomal DNA replication and repair. PCNA forms a homotrimer ring, which may function as a DNA sliding clamp for DNA polymerases and, possibly, a docking station for other replication- and repair-related proteins. Several reports have suggested the existence of different PCNA isoforms. Here we confirm, using high resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis with narrow pH ranges, the existence of three PCNA isoforms in both Chinese hamster and human breast cancer cells. Among the three isoforms, M or main form is the dominant one throughout the cell cycle while the relative amounts of the minor components A (acidic) and B (basic) forms appear to vary during the cell cycle. We also observed that a specific pattern of PCNA proteolysis occurred during isoelectric focusing in spite of high urea (8 M) and detergent (2% 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylamino]-1-propane sulfonate), which was largely inhibited by the proteosome inhibitor MG132 or boiling. Interestingly, the proteolysis pattern was mainly observed with samples isolated from cells in S and G2 phases. A similar but much lower level of PCNA proteolysis also occurred in vivo within the nuclei of the cells in S phase. Taken together, our data are consistent with the idea that the existence of the different isoforms and specific proteolysis of PCNA are relevant to its functions in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".