EFFECT OF FILMS OF DIFFERENT OXYGEN TRANSMISSION RATE ON TOXIN PRODUCTION BY <i>CLOSTRIDIUM BOTULINUM</i> TYPE E IN VACUUM PACKAGED COLD AND HOT SMOKED TROUT FILLETS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Studies were done to determine the effect of film oxygen transmission rate (OTR) on the time to toxicity in vacuum packaged cold and hot smoked rainbow trout fillets challenged with C. botulinum type E (102 spores/g) and stored at refrigerated conditions (4C), and under mild (8C) and moderate (12C) temperature abuse conditions. While no samples were toxic at 4C, toxin was detected within 28 days at 8C for cold smoked trout fillets vacuum packaged in films with high OTR. Toxin was also detected for most vacuum packaged hot smoked trout fillets within 14–28 days at 8C, with the exception of trout fillets packaged in films with an OTR > 10,000 cc/m2/day. In most cases at 8C, spoilage, based on odor/color scores, preceded or occurred simultaneously with toxigenesis. At 12C all cold and hot smoked trout were toxic after 14–21 days and samples packaged in films with an OTR <5000 cc/m2/day became toxic before, or at the same time as, samples became spoiled. This study has shown that vacuum packaging of trout fillets in low gas barrier films, ranging in OTR from approximately 3,000 to approximately 10,000 cc/m2/day at 24C and 0% relative humidity (RH), did not prevent the growth and toxin production by C. botulinum in vacuum packaged cold and hot smoked trout fillets at 12C. Additional barriers, other than the OTR of the packaging film, need to be considered to ensure the safety of vacuum packaged trout fillets, particularly at mild to moderate temperature abuse storage conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".