MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2026377988 · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-32

Requirements for ethics committee review for studies submitted to Implementation Science

2011· article· en· W2026377988 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Eccles, Charles Weijer, Brian S. Mittman

Bibliographic record

VenueImplementation Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaiverResearch ethicsMedicineHealth services researchEngineering ethicsEthics committeeSubject (documents)Human researchHealth administrationHealth informaticsHealth carePublic healthPolitical scienceLawPublic administrationLibrary scienceNursingComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The requirement for ethics review of studies submitted to Implementation Science has been unclear. Therefore, in this editorial, we set out our requirements for ethics committee review of experimental and non-experimental studies. For any study that meets the criteria of human subject research (which includes research on healthcare providers), irrespective of study design, we will require proof of either satisfactory ethics committee review or of the granting of an official exemption or waiver.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.675
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.837
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.6750.837
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.009
Bibliometrics0.0110.010
Science and technology studies0.0120.016
Scholarly communication0.0210.014
Open science0.0120.010
Research integrity0.0590.037
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.834
GPT teacher head0.763
Teacher spread0.071 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainEvaluation
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImplementation ScienceSame topicEthics in medical practiceFrench-language works237,207