Molecular and cytogenetic analysis of repetitive DNA in pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i>L.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A set of pea DNA sequences representing the most abundant genomic repeats was obtained by combining several approaches. Dispersed repeats were isolated by screening a short-insert genomic library using genomic DNA as a probe. Thirty-two clones ranging from 149 to 2961 bp in size and from 1,000 to 39,000/lC in their copy number were sequenced and further characterized. Fourteen clones were identified as retrotransposon-like sequences, based on their homologies to known elements. Fluorescence in situ hybridization using clones of reverse transcriptase and integrase coding sequences as probes revealed that corresponding retroelements were scattered along all pea chromosomes. Two novel families of tandem repeats, named PisTR-A and PisTR-B, were isolated by screening a genomic DNA library with Cot-1 DNA and by employing genomic self-priming PCR, respectively. PisTR-A repeats are 211-212 bp long, their abundance is 2 x 10(4) copies/lC, and they are partially clustered in a secondary constriction of one chromosome pair with the rest of their copies dispersed on all chromosomes. PisTR-B sequences are of similar abundance (10(4) copies/lC) but differ from the "A" family in their monomer length (50 bp), high A/T content, and chromosomal localization in a limited number of discrete bands. These bands are located mainly in (sub)telomeric and pericentromeric regions. and their patterns, together with chromosome morphology, allow discrimination of all chromosome types within the pea karyotype. Whereas both tandem repeat families are mostly specific to the genus Pisum, many of the dispersed repeats were detected in other legume species, mainly those in the genus Vicia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".