POTENTIAL ANTIOXIDATIVE EFFECTS OF CACTUS PEAR FRUIT (<i>OPUNTIA FICUS‐INDICA</i>) EXTRACT ON RADICAL SCAVENGING AND DNA DAMAGE REDUCTION IN HUMAN PERIPHERAL LYMPHOCYTES
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Cactus pear fruit ( Opuntia ficus‐indica ) extract (CPFE) was investigated for its antioxidative and DNA damage reduction using electron spin resonance spectroscopy and comet assays on human peripheral lymphocytes, respectively. Scavenging of 1,1‐diphenyl‐2‐picrylhydrazyl adducts by CPFE at 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/mL was 32.5, 56.7 and 71.6%, respectively. CPFE at 0.25 and 0.5 mg/mL scavenged 19.2 and 63.6% of 5,5‐dimethyl‐1‐pyrroline N‐oxide‐ OH adducts. Alkyl radical scavenging effect of CPFE at 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/mL was 38.0, 42.4, 67.5 and 78.8%, respectively. CPFE reduced the H 2 O 2 ‐induced DNA damage in lymphocytes (CPFE at 0.1 mg/mL totally inhibited the damage). The data demonstrate that both antioxidative and DNA damage‐reduction activities are increased with increasing CPFE dosage. These results demonstrate the antioxidative and DNA damage‐reducing efficacy of CPFE constituents as potential sources of raw material for pharmaceutical and functional food industries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it