MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028084006 · doi:10.2174/13816128113199990458

Transporter-Based Delivery of Anticancer Drugs to the Brain: Improving Brain Penetration by Minimizing Drug Efflux at the Blood-Brain Barrier

2014· review· en· W2028084006 on OpenAlexaff
Ngoc On, Donald W. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Pharmaceutical Design · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEffluxBlood–brain barrierAbcg2PharmacologyParacellular transportP-glycoproteinTransporterATP-binding cassette transporterDrugDrug deliveryMedicineBrain tumorDrug resistanceDrug delivery to the brainCentral nervous systemMultiple drug resistanceBiologyChemistryPermeability (electromagnetism)Internal medicinePathologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The delivery of many drugs to the central nervous system (CNS) is limited due to the restrictive nature of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The reduced paracellular diffusion and the presence of various drug efflux transporters in the brain microvessel endothelial cells forming the BBB make effective treatment of brain tumors with chemotherapeutic agents particularly problematic. While Pglycoprotein (P-gp) plays an important role in limiting BBB permeability of chemotherapeutic agents, other drug efflux transporters such as breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRPs) are likely to impact on chemotherapeutic levels within the brain and brain tumor. The current review examines the restrictive role that drug efflux transporters have in the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the brain. Consideration of different approaches taken to minimize the impact of drug efflux transporters in the BBB and improve chemotherapeutic response in treating brain tumors is also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Pharmaceutical DesignSame topicDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsFrench-language works237,207