Phenotypic changes associated with deletion and overexpression of a stage-regulated gene family in Leishmania
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The LmcDNA16 locus of Leishmania major contains three highly related genes HASPA1, HASPA2 and HASPB, encoding hydrophilic, acylated surface proteins and a tandem pair of unrelated sequences, SHERP1 and SHERP2, coding for a small, hydrophilic protein that localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum and outer mitochondrial membrane. Differential regulation of these genes results in expression of a subset of the HASP proteins and SHERP only in infective stage parasites. To assess the contribution of these molecules to parasite virulence, the diploid LmcDNA16 gene locus has been removed by targeted gene deletion. Homozygous null mutants have precise deletions of both alleles and exhibit no HASP or SHERP expression. They are at least as virulent as wild-type parasites in macrophage invasion and intracellular survival assays, both in vitro and in vivo. Conversely, null mutants engineered to overexpress the entire LmcDNA16 gene locus are unable to survive within the intramacrophage environment despite their differentiation into infective metacyclic parasites. Both null and overexpressing null parasites show increased sensitivity to complement-mediated lysis, suggesting perturbation of their surface architecture. Avirulence in overexpressing parasites correlates with selective depletion of a specific lipid species, decreased expression of the major surface glycoprotein GP63, but no significant downregulation of the glycoconjugate lipophosphoglycan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".