MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029309387 · doi:10.1038/sj.jes.7500509

The effects of recall errors and of selection bias in epidemiologic studies of mobile phone use and cancer risk

2006· article· en· W2029309387 on OpenAlexaff
Martine Vrijheid, Isabelle Deltour, Daniel Krewski, Elisabeth Cardis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsMobile phoneRecallPhoneRecall biasInformation biasSelection (genetic algorithm)Selection biasStatisticsComputer sciencePsychologyMathematicsArtificial intelligenceSocial psychologyCognitive psychologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.443
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.734
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.686

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.4430.734
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.013
Bibliometrics0.0070.011
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.009
Open science0.0070.006
Research integrity0.0100.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Exposure Science & Environmental EpidemiologySame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207