MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030403704 · doi:10.1139/gen-44-1-96

Centromeric tandem repeat from the chaffinch genome: Isolation and molecular characterization

2001· article· en· W2030403704 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alsu Saifitdinova, Svetlana Derjusheva, Andrei Malykh, Vladimir Zhurov, T F Andreeva, Elena Gaginskaya

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGeneticsTandem repeatGenomegenomic DNAFluorescence in situ hybridizationMolecular biologyChromosomeDNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new family of avian centromeric satellites is described. The highly repeated sequence, designated FCP (Fringilla coelebs PstI element), was cloned from the 500-bp PstI digest fraction of the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs L.) genomic DNA, sequenced, and characterized. The FCP repeat was found to have 505-506 bp length of monomer, 57% content of GC, to compose about 0.9% of the chaffinch genome, and to be highly methylated. Results of Southern-blot hybridization of cloned FCP element onto genomic DNA digested with different restriction enzymes, and sequencing directly from total genomic DNA using FCP-specific primers and ThermoFidelase enzyme (Fidelity Systems Inc.) were in agreement with a tandem arrangement of this repeat in the chaffinch genome. Five positions of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) were found in the FCP monomers using direct genomic sequencing. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with FCP probe and primed in situ labelling (PRINS) with FCP specific primers showed that the FCP elements occupy pericentric regions of all chaffinch chromosomes. On chromosome spreads, the fluorescent signals were also observed in the intercentromeric connectives between nonhomologous chromosomes. The results suggest that the centromeric FCP repeat is responsible for chromosome ordering during mitosis in chaffinch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207