Sources of evidence to support systematic reviews in librarianship
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SALUD) Public Health Information Pilot Project objectives 1. Develop a cadre of community health nursing students who are knowledgeable in accessing and evaluating health education materials and who would use and share these skills in practice in the community 2. Develop a pilot project, based on the needs assessment, to increase patient health education by improving access to quality reading-level and language-appropriate materials in two Chicago Department of Public Health public health clinics serving inner-city, low-income, predominately Latino populations 3. Increase access to and knowledge about quality health information resources for health care practitioners working in two inner city clinics Sustainable collaboration for community outreach: lessons from the Spanish Access to Literature/Uso Directo (SALUD) project*
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.235 | 0.639 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.022 | 0.020 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.065 | 0.037 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".