MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032194573 · doi:10.3163/1536-5050.96.1.66

Sources of evidence to support systematic reviews in librarianship

2008· article· en· W2032194573 on OpenAlexaff
Margaret Sampson, Raymond Daniel, Elise Cogo, Orvie Dingwall

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Medical Library Association JMLA · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
Canadian institutionsCanadian Patient Safety InstituteChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
KeywordsSystematic reviewField (mathematics)Data scienceComputer scienceLibrary scienceMEDLINEManagement sciencePolitical scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SALUD) Public Health Information Pilot Project objectives 1. Develop a cadre of community health nursing students who are knowledgeable in accessing and evaluating health education materials and who would use and share these skills in practice in the community 2. Develop a pilot project, based on the needs assessment, to increase patient health education by improving access to quality reading-level and language-appropriate materials in two Chicago Department of Public Health public health clinics serving inner-city, low-income, predominately Latino populations 3. Increase access to and knowledge about quality health information resources for health care practitioners working in two inner city clinics Sustainable collaboration for community outreach: lessons from the Spanish Access to Literature/Uso Directo (SALUD) project*

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.182
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.454
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1820.454
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.783
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Medical Library Association JMLASame topicMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsFrench-language works237,207