A Pituitary-Specific Enhancer of the POMC Gene with Preferential Activity in Corticotrope Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cell-specific expression of the pituitary proopiomelanocortin (POMC) gene depends on the combination of tissue- and cell-restricted transcription factors such as Pitx1 and Tpit. These factors act on the proximal POMC promoter together with transcription factors that integrate inputs from signaling pathways. We now report the identification of an upstream enhancer in the POMC locus that is targeted by the same subset of transcription factors, except Pitx1. This enhancer located at -7 kb in the mouse POMC gene is highly dependent on Tpit for activity. Whereas Tpit requires Pitx1 for action on the promoter, it acts on the -7-kb enhancer as homodimers binding to a palindromic Tpit response element (TpitRE). Both half-sites of the TpitRE palindrome and Tpit homodimerization are required for activity. In vivo, the enhancer exhibits preferential activity in corticotrope cells of the anterior lobe whereas the promoter exhibits preference for intermediate lobe melanotropes. The enhancer is conserved among different species with the TpitRE palindrome localized at the center of conserved sequences. However, the mouse and human -7-kb enhancers do not exhibit conservation of hormone responsiveness and may differ in their relative importance for POMC expression. In summary, pituitary expression of the POMC gene relies on an upstream enhancer that complements the activity of the proximal promoter with Tpit as the major regulator of both regulatory regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".