Design of Pressure Hulls Using Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through the use of nonlinear finite element analysis (NLFEA), submarine pressure hull designs could potentially be based on calculated limit states that include the full geometric complexity of the structure, and real-world effects such as build imperfections. In addition, NLFEA could provide a rational means of assessing the effects of in-service damage on structural performance. Analysis of pressure hulls using 3D NLFEA is not currently supported in design codes, primarily because the uncertainty regarding the accuracy of the method has not been quantified. Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC), the R&D branch of the Canadian Navy, is undertaking work to develop a partial safety factor for 3D NLFEA of pressure hulls, by comparison of numerically calculated collapse pressures to experimental results. Data from experiments previously conducted at various institutions will be augmented by a pressure hull testing program currently being undertaken by a joint project of DRDC and the Ministry of Defence of the Netherlands. The development of NLFEA modeling and analysis guidelines, as well as a revised design/analysis procedure, will be discussed, as well as a history of the DRDC submarine structures research program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it