MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033525382 · doi:10.1139/g02-029

Genomic structure and homoeologous relationship of the two α-subunit genes of a heterotrimeric GTP-binding protein in tobacco

2002· article· en· W2033525382 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shigeo Takumi, Makiko Ida, Yoshiyuki Haisa, Seiji Ando, Chiharu Nakamura

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHeterotrimeric G proteinGeneticsIntronGeneExonGenomeNicotianaG proteinSignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A heterotrimeric GTP-binding protein (G protein) plays a number of important roles in the signal-transduction pathways of eukaryotic cells. The allotetraploid tobacco genome has two alpha-subunit genes, NtGA1 and NtGA2, of the heterotrimeric G protein. In this study, we determined the nucleotide sequences and the exon-intron structures of the NtGA loci in tobacco and its ancestral diploid species. The genomic sequences of the NtGA loci were interrupted by 13 introns. The sizes of most exons (12 of 14) were completely conserved among the NtGA genes and the Arabidopsis alpha-subunit gene (GPA1), but most introns (11 of 13) in the NtGA genes were longer than those in GPA1. In comparison with the genomic sequences of the NtGA orthologues of ancestral Nicotiana sylvestris and Nicotiana tomentosiformis, the tobacco NtGA1 and NtGA2 were concluded to be homoeologous and assigned to the S and T genomes, respectively. More than 300 mutations including insertions-deletions (indels) and nucleotide substitutions were found in the intron regions between the NtGA1 and NtGA2 loci, whereas the exon sequences were highly conserved among these and GPA1. The structural comparison revealed larger divergence at the NtGA2 locus than at NtGA1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolismFrench-language works237,207