The ‘Interanimation’ of Worlds: Creative Metaphors in Art and Design
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Creative metaphors in language juxtapose two words which appear quite different on the surface, but share an underlying similarity given a particular context. In the metaphor ‘life is a river,’ the vehicle ‘river’ modifies the tenor ‘life’ and draws our attention to life's meandering and the constant flow of time. Scholars have emphasized a dynamic tension between tenor and vehicle and that the vehicle (‘river’) is always salient modifying the tenor (‘life’) and never vice versa. A central argument of this paper is that: (1) the vehicle is salient because it is always relatively more concrete than the tenor on the sensory-verbal-symbolic continuum, and (2) the vehicle always modifies the tenor implicitly and spontaneously so that they are experienced as a unity. These ideas have been extended to successful art and design metaphors. The surface difference in artworks and design objects is between denotative subject matter and connotative style or function and form respectively. The underlying similarity reflect the influence of concrete sensory style or form properties which resonate with subject matter or function respectively thereby creating a tacit experience of fit. This unified experience establishes a bridge between the viewer/user and the work that is the foundation for a personal attachment to it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it