MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Freeze‐substitution and low‐temperature embedding of dairy products for transmission electron microscopy

2003· article· en· W2037342130 on OpenAlexaff
A.K. Smith, H. Douglas Goff, Bokang Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Microscopy · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmission electron microscopySubstitution (logic)Electron microscopeCryo-electron microscopyCrystallographyMaterials scienceTransmission (telecommunications)EmbeddingChemistryNanotechnologyChemical engineeringOpticsPhysicsComputer scienceEngineeringBiochemistryArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dairy products are comprised largely of fat, air and water, which makes it difficult to preserve their ultrastructure for electron microscopy. Keeping the samples frozen throughout fixation and embedding protects the structure and distribution of the components of emulsions and foams. Therefore, dairy products were freeze-substituted and embedded at low temperature (-20 degrees C) to prepare them for transmission electron microscopy. Whipped cream, ice cream mix and dairy/non-dairy mixed systems were frozen by plunging in propane, at its boiling point (-187 degrees C). Ice cream, because it is already frozen, was fractured into 1-mm3 pieces in liquid nitrogen and then added to frozen fixative (-196 degrees C). Fixative solution consisted of glutaraldehyde, osmium tetroxide and uranyl acetate dissolved in either methanol or acetone. When material was to be stained after sectioning the fixative was limited to glutaraldehyde in methanol. The temperature was increased step-wise from -80 to -20 degrees C. Solvent was replaced with resin; the polar resin Lowicryl HM4, the non-polar resin Lowicryl HM20, LR White and LR Gold were tested. Samples were embedded and polymerized at -20 degrees C using ultraviolet light to cross-link the resin. Methanol proved to be the most effective solvent for substituting the ice; the hydrophobic resin Lowicryl HM20 was the most effective resin for retaining fat structure following osmium fixation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of MicroscopySame topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactionsFrench-language works237,207