An artificial peptide with corticotropin‐releasing factor receptor‐2 (CRF‐R2) selective properties: the role of primary structure in the induction of signal transduction pathways
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Considerable plasticity can occur within the amino acid sequence of amphiphilic peptide hormones. This is particularly evident within the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) family of peptides where, despite less than 15% sequence similarity among the four paralogous lineages, all are capable of acting as high affinity ligands to members of the CRF receptor family. This suggests that these peptides could undergo many mutational changes and remain as high affinity ligands to their receptors as long as the functional motifs do not change radically. Because paralogous peptide lineages are a product of genome duplications, additional genes encoding peptide-like sequences, which through mutation have lost their functional integrity, may exist. Function to these sequences may be restored if the appropriate motifs are reinserted into the primary structure. We screened rat genomic DNA with highly degenerate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers targeted to hybridize with the termini of CRF-related sequences. One set of sauvagine-based primers hybridized with a 120-bp sequence. The theoretical peptide sequence (SV4) showed similarity to the CRF family of peptides at the primary structure level. The encoded sequence was prepared by solid-phase synthesis and its activity assayed against mouse R1 and human R1/R2 receptors. SV4 did not bind to either mouse or human variants of the R1 receptor, but did bind to the R2 receptor with an affinity comparable to human CRF. SV4 exhibited a similar efficacy of cellular activation as CRF in trials quantifying the acidification rate of human R2alpha-transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, but not R1-transfected cells. SV4 utilizes adenylate cyclase as the principal secondary messenger of R2 signal transduction but, unlike urocortin or sauvagine, does not activate guanylate cyclase-, calcium- or mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase-mediated pathways. These data suggest that this artificial peptide may be useful to understand the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent component of the CRF-R2 signal transduction cascade, and that additional sequences in the genome may be used to engineer bioactive peptides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".