Phylogenetic analysis of <i>Carthamus</i> species based on the nucleotide sequence of the nuclear SACPD gene and chloroplast <i>trn</i>L–<i>trn</i>F IGS region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To clarify the phylogenetic relationships of Carthamus species, we performed sequence analysis of the nuclear stearoyl acyl carrier protein desaturase (SACPD) gene and the chloroplast intergenic spacer region between leucine and phenylalanine tRNA genes (trnL-trnF IGS) in 13 taxa of Carthamus. The previous division of the genus into 4 taxonomic sections and allocation of particular genomes to various taxa on the basis of morphological, cytogenetic, and biosystematic analyses is not supported by the present study. Our results provide evidence of the occurrence of 5 nuclear genomes (A, B, C, X, and Y) and 3 cytoplasm types (A, B, and C) in the genus Carthamus. The cultivated safflower, C. tinctorius (2n = 24), has the B genome and type B cytoplasm. Both of these are not present in the polyploid taxa. This contradicts the earlier view that one of the genomes involved in the origin of the polyploid taxa of Carthamus is the B genome. Comparison with an outgroup species (Cirsium japonicum) indicated that C. arborescens is the most primitive species in the genus. Carthamus palaestinus is genetically closest to the cultivated safflower.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".