Characteristics of groundwater seepage with cut-off wall in gravel aquifer. I: Field observations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a case history of the leakage behavior during dewatering tests in the gravel strata of an excavation pit of a metro station in Hangzhou, China. The groundwater system at the test site is composed of a phreatic aquifer underlain by an aquitard and a confined aquifer with coarse sand and gravel. The sandy gravel stratum has very high hydraulic conductivity. The maximum depth of the excavation is 24 m below the ground surface, which reaches the middle of the aquitard strata, where the thickness of the clayey soil is insufficient to maintain the safety of the base of the excavation. To understand the hydrological characteristics of gravel strata, single- and double-well pumping tests were conducted, where a cut-off wall was installed 43 m deep with its base penetrating 2 to 3 m into the aquifer. Test results show that this partial cut-off of the aquifer cannot effectively protect the base of the excavation from the upward seepage force of the groundwater during excavation. Therefore, a new cut-off wall (second phase) was constructed to a depth of 54 m to cut off the confined aquifer. A second pumping test was conducted after the construction of the second phase cut-off wall, and test results show that this full cut-off combined with dewatering can control groundwater effectively during excavation. This finding indicates that when a deep excavation is conducted in a confined aquifer with high hydraulic conductivity, determination of the depth of the retaining wall should be based on three factors: the stability of the base, the upward seepage stability, and settlement control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".