The zinc finger protein Gfi1 is implicated in the regulation of IgG2b production and the expression of Iγ2b germline transcripts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gfi1 is a zinc finger transcription factor that is undetectable in B lymphocytes but its expression rises rapidly upon antigenic stimulation or treatment with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Here we show that Gfi1(-/-) mice have higher serum levels of gamma isotype immunoglobulin than WT animals. When challenged with antigen, Gfi1(-/-) mice react with accelerated formation of PNA+/CD19+ germinal center B cells and an increased production of antigen-specific IgG2a and IgG2b. Moreover, Gfi1(-/-) B cells secrete more IgG2a and IgG2b than WT cells and produce higher levels of Igamma2b sterile germline transcripts when cultured with LPS. While the proliferative response to stimulation with anti-IgM antibodies and plasma cell differentiation was normal in Gfi1(-/-) B cells, we found that mRNA and protein levels of TGFbeta1 were significantly increased in the absence of Gfi1. TGFbeta1 has been shown to be essential for the regulation of IgG subclass production and was previously found to selectively stimulate IgG2b secretion. Our findings reveal a new function of Gfi1 in the control of IgG isotype production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".