MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038518325 · doi:10.1002/eji.200838251

The zinc finger protein Gfi1 is implicated in the regulation of IgG2b production and the expression of Iγ2b germline transcripts

2008· article· en· W2038518325 on OpenAlexaff
Emeka I. Igwe, Christian Kosan, Cyrus Khandanpour, Ehssan Sharif‐Askari, Bernhard Brüne, Tarik Möröy

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Immunology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBlood disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsBiologyIsotypeGermlineGerminal centerCD19AntigenAntibodyImmunoglobulin class switchingSecretionMolecular biologyTranscription (linguistics)Messenger RNAStimulationLipopolysaccharideCell biologyB cellImmunologyGeneMonoclonal antibodyEndocrinologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gfi1 is a zinc finger transcription factor that is undetectable in B lymphocytes but its expression rises rapidly upon antigenic stimulation or treatment with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Here we show that Gfi1(-/-) mice have higher serum levels of gamma isotype immunoglobulin than WT animals. When challenged with antigen, Gfi1(-/-) mice react with accelerated formation of PNA+/CD19+ germinal center B cells and an increased production of antigen-specific IgG2a and IgG2b. Moreover, Gfi1(-/-) B cells secrete more IgG2a and IgG2b than WT cells and produce higher levels of Igamma2b sterile germline transcripts when cultured with LPS. While the proliferative response to stimulation with anti-IgM antibodies and plasma cell differentiation was normal in Gfi1(-/-) B cells, we found that mRNA and protein levels of TGFbeta1 were significantly increased in the absence of Gfi1. TGFbeta1 has been shown to be essential for the regulation of IgG subclass production and was previously found to selectively stimulate IgG2b secretion. Our findings reveal a new function of Gfi1 in the control of IgG isotype production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of ImmunologySame topicBlood disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207