The Dual Histidine Motif in the Active Site of Pin1 Has a Structural Rather than Catalytic Role
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The catalytic domain of the peptidyl-prolyl cis/ trans isomerase Pin1 is a member of the FKBP superfold family. Within its active site are two highly conserved histidine residues, H59 and H157. Despite their sequence conservation in parvulin PPIase domains, the role of these histidine residues remains unclear. Our previous work (Behrsin et al. (2007) J. Mol. Biol. 365, 1143- 1162.) was consistent with a model where one or both histidines had critical roles in a hydrogen bonding network in the active site. Here, we test this model by looking at the effect of mutations to H59 and H157 on Pin1 function, activity, and protein stability. Using a yeast complementation assay, we show that both H59 and H157 can be mutated to non-hydrogen bonding residues and still support viability. Surprisingly, a nonfunctional H59L mutation can be rescued by a mutation of H157, to leucine. This double mutation (H59L/H157L) also had about 5-fold greater isomerase activity than the H59L mutation with a phosphorylated substrate. Structural analyses suggest that rescue of function and activity results from partial rescue of protein stability. Our findings indicate that H59 and H157 are not required for hydrogen bonding within the active site, and in contrast to the active site C113, they do not participate directly in catalysis. Instead, we suggest these histidines play a key role in domain structure or stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".