Syntheses, Molecular Structures, and Vibrational Spectra of Chloropentacarbonylrhodium(III) and -iridium(III) Undecafluorodiantimonate(V), [Rh(CO)<sub>5</sub>Cl][Sb<sub>2</sub>F<sub>11</sub>]<sub>2</sub>and [Ir(CO)<sub>5</sub>Cl][Sb<sub>2</sub>F<sub>11</sub>]<sub>2</sub>: An Experimental and Density Functional Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reactions of either bis(mu-chloro)tetracarbonyldirhodium(I), [Rh(CO)2(mu-Cl)]2, or chlorotricarbonyliridium(I), [Ir(CO)3Cl]n, in the conjugate Brønsted-Lewis superacid HF-SbF5 and in a CO atmosphere, produce [Rh(CO)5Cl][Sb2F11]2 or [Ir(CO)5Cl][Sb2F11]2, respectively. In these oxidative carbonylation reactions, antimony(V) fluoride functions as an oxidizing agent. The reduced product is identified as 6SbF3.5SbF5. [Rh(CO)5Cl][Sb2F11]2 is obtained in the form of single crystals. Crystal data: monoclinic, space group P2(1) (No. 4); a = 9.721(1), b = 12.602(1), c = 10.538(1) A; beta = 106.51(1) degrees; V = 1237.7(2) A3; Z = 2; T = 300 K; R1 [I > 3 sigma (I)] = 0.0367, wR2 = 0.0739. Single crystals of [Ir(CO)5Cl][Sb2F11]2 are produced in small amounts from a solution of mer-Ir(CO)3(SO3F)3 in magic acid, HSO3F-SbF5. The possible source of chlorine will be discussed. Crystal data for [Ir-(CO)5Cl][Sb2F11]2: monoclinic, space group P2(1) (No. 4); a = 9.686(2), b = 12.585(2), c = 10.499(2) A; beta = 106.59(2) degrees; V = 1226.5(4) A3; Z = 2; T = 294 K; R1[I > 3 sigma (I)] = 0.032, Rw = 0.031. The bond lengths and bond angles are nearly identical in the two isostructural salts; however, the cell volume of [Ir(CO)5Cl][Sb2F11]2 is slightly smaller than that of [Rh(CO)5Cl][Sb2F11]2. The cations (point group C4v) feature unusually long M-C bonds (M = Rh, Ir) and correspondingly short CO bonds, as well as high CO stretching wavenumbers and high CO stretching force constants. The [Sb2F11]- anions are not symmetry related, and their dihedral and bridge angles differ slightly in both salts. There are significant interionic contacts in [Ir(CO)5Cl][Sb2F11]2 exclusively of the C-F type (about 2 for each C atom of the five carbonyl groups) resulting in extended structures. The vibrational spectra for both [M(CO)5Cl]2+ cations (M = Rh, Ir) are assigned with the help of density functional calculations, which also provide intensities for IR and Raman bands. While [Rh(CO)5Cl]2+ is the first cationic carbonyl derivative of Rh(III), the vibrational and structural parameters for [Ir(CO)5Cl]2+ are compared to data for [Ir(CO)6]3+ and mer-Ir(CO)3(SO3F)3.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".