Imprinting and deviation from Mendelian transmission ratios
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deviations from a Mendelian 1:1 transmission ratio have been observed in human and mouse chromosomes. With few exceptions, the underlying mechanism of the transmission-ratio distortion remains obscure. We tested a hypothesis that grandparental-origin dependent transmission-ratio distortion is related to imprinting and possibly results from the loss of embryos which carry imprinted genes with imprinting marks that have been incorrectly reset. We analyzed transmission of alleles in four regions of the human genome that carry imprinted genes presumably critical for normal embryonic growth and development: 11p15.5 (H19, IGF2, HASH2, etc.), 11p13 (WT1), 7p11-12 (GRB10), and 6q25-q27 (IGF2R), among the offspring of 31 three-generation Centre d'Etude de polymorphism Humain (CEPH) families. Deviations from expected 1:1 ratios were found in the maternal chromosomes for regions 11p15.5, 11p13, and 6q25-27 and in the paternal chromosomes for regions 11p15 and 7p11-p12. The likelihood of the results was assessed empirically to be statistically significant (p = 0.0008), suggesting that the transmission ratios in the imprinted regions significantly deviated from 1:1. We did not find deviations from a 1:1 transmission ratio in imprinted regions that are not crucial for embryo viability (13q14 and 15q11-q13). The analysis of a larger set of 51 families for the 11p15.5 region suggests that there is heterogeneity among the families with regard to the transmission of 11p15.5 alleles. The results of this study are consistent with the hypothesis that grandparental-origin dependent transmission-ratio distortion is related to imprinting and embryo loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".