MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040201361 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-4423

Abstract 4423: Transgenic liver expression of human arylamine <i>N</i>-acetyltransferase NAT2 restores sensitivity of male Nat1/2 null mice to 4-aminobiphenyl-induced liver tumorigenesis

2012· article· en· W2040201361 on OpenAlexaff
Denis M. Grant, Debbie Brenneman, Kim S. Sugamori

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiopolymer Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenetically modified mouseCarcinogenCarcinogenesisEndocrinologyInternal medicineRatónLiver tumorBiologyTransgeneMedicineCancerHepatocellular carcinomaGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We recently observed that male Nat1/2(-/-) mice, which are deficient in the arylamine N-acetyltransferases Nat1 and Nat2, have a significantly lower incidence and multiplicity of liver tumors than wild-type C57BL/6 mice after their neonatal exposure to the aromatic amine carcinogen 4-aminobiphenyl (ABP). Female mice showed low or no liver tumors from ABP exposure regardless of Nat1/2 status. The goal of the present study was to determine the effect of liver-selective transgenic expression of human NAT2 on ABP-induced liver tumorigenicity in male and female Nat1/2(-/-) mice. We generated a hNAT2tgNat1/2(-/-) strain of mice that express human NAT2 selectively in liver on a Nat1/2 null background, exposed male and female mice to either DMSO vehicle, a low dose (600 nmoles) or a high dose (1200 nmoles) of ABP during the second postnatal week, and assessed mice for tumor growth at one year of age. Male hNAT2tgNat1/2(-/-) mice had liver tumor incidences of 29% (low dose) and 61% (high dose), which more closely resembled those of C57BL/6 mice (60% and 69%, respectively) than those of Nat1/2(-/-) mice (0% and 35%, respectively). This suggests that human NAT2 is capable of substantially restoring the sensitivity of mice to ABP-induced liver tumorigenicity that is lost by the absence of mouse Nat1 and Nat2. On the other hand, female hNAT2tgNat1/2(-/-) mice were still as resistant to liver tumors as C57BL/6 or Nat1/2(-/-) mice. No tumors were observed in any other organs. These results suggest that the human and mouse NAT enzymes play similar roles in enhancing liver tumor growth, and that the mechanism of female protection against ABP-induced tumor growth is unrelated to NAT status. However, neither the sex nor the NAT status of the mice appear to be correlated with the ability of ABP to produce acute DNA-damaging or mutation-inducing effects in liver. This suggests that the role of the human and mouse NAT enzymes in promoting liver tumor growth in mice may be due to a mechanism that is independent of their ability to influence the process of ABP metabolic activation and subsequent DNA damage leading to tumor initiation. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4423. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-4423

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicBiopolymer Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207