MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040389355 · doi:10.4161/cc.5.16.3009

Absence of an Immediate G1/S Checkpoint in Primary MEFs Following γ-irradiation Identifies a Novel Checkpoint Switch

2006· article· en· W2040389355 on OpenAlexaff
Kendra L. Cann, Geoffrey G. Hicks

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsG2-M DNA damage checkpointBiologyCHEK1Gamma irradiationCell cycle checkpointCell biologyCancer researchCell cycleIrradiationGeneticsApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DNA double-strand breaks caused by ionizing radiation have been shown to induce G(1)/S, intra-S-phase, and G(2)/M cell cycle checkpoints. However, analysis of the immediate induction of G(1)/S checkpoint at a cellular level has been hampered by the inability to distinguish cells that were already replicating DNA at the time of damage from cells that entered S phase following the DNA damage. We have developed a novel strategy for assessing the initiation of the G(1)/S checkpoint following gamma-irradiation within asynchronous, low passage, primary mouse embryonic fibroblast cultures (MEFs) using a staggered CldU/IdU double-labeling protocol. Contrary to the current model of the G(1)/S checkpoint, we found that 65% of late- G(1) primary MEFs still proceeded into S phase after a gamma-irradiation dose of 5 Gy. The delayed p53-dependent G(1)/S checkpoint was intact in these cells, and a G2/M checkpoint that was over 90% effective was induced within one hour and maintained through six hours post-irradiation. Furthermore, these cells also exhibited an intra-S-phase replication slow-down, as there was a decrease in the S/ G(2) transition frequency of primary MEFs following gamma-irradiation. The absence of an immediate G(1)/S checkpoint in primary MEFs suggests that in late G(1) these cells may predominantly respond to DNA damage at the level of individual replication origins, rather than by inducing a complete shut-down of S-phase entry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207