MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041003815 · doi:10.1021/bc900443a

Evaluation of Bifunctional Chelates for the Development of Gallium-Based Radiopharmaceuticals

2010· article· en· W2041003815 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioconjugate Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsOttawa Heart InstituteNordion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryIn vivoDOTAYield (engineering)RadiochemistryChelationBifunctionalNuclear chemistryCombinatorial chemistryBiochemistryInorganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ga radioisotopes, including the generator-produced positron-emitting isotope (68)Ga (t1/2 = 68 min), are of increasing interest for the development of new radiopharmaceuticals. Bifunctional chelates (BFCs) that can be efficiently radiolabeled with Ga to yield complexes with good in vivo stability are needed. To this end, we undertook a systematic comparison of four BFCs containing different chelating moieties: two novel BFCs, p-NO2-Bn-Oxo (1-oxa-4,7,10-triazacyclododecane-4,7,10-triacetic acid) and p-NO2-Bn-PCTA (3,6,9,15-tetraazabicyclo [9.3.1]pentadeca-1(15),11,13-triene-3,6,9-triacetic acid), and two more commonly used BFCs, p-NO2-Bn-DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid) and p-NO2-Bn-NOTA (1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid). Each BFC was compared with respect to radiolabeling conditions, radiochemical yield, stability, and in vivo clearance properties. p-NO2-Bn-PCTA, p-NO2-Bn-Oxo, and p-NO2-Bn-NOTA were all more efficiently radiolabeled with Ga compared to p-NO2-Bn-DOTA. p-NO2-Bn-DOTA required longer reaction time, higher concentrations of BFC, or heating to obtain equivalent radiochemical yields. Better stability was observed for p-NO2-Bn-NOTA and p-NO2-Bn-PCTA compared to p-NO2-Bn-DOTA and p-NO2-Bn-Oxo, especially with respect to transmetalation to transferrin. Ga-radiolabled p-NO2-Bn-Oxo was found to be kinetically labile and therefore unstable in vivo. Ga-radiolabeled p-NO2-Bn-NOTA and p-NO2-Bn-PCTA were relatively inert, while Ga-radiolabeled p-NO2-Bn-DOTA had intermediate stability, losing >20% of Ga in less than one hour when incubated with apo-transferrin. Similar stability differences were seen when incubating at pH 2. In vivo PET imaging and biodistribution studies in mice showed that (68)Ga-radiolabeled p-NO2-Bn-PCTA, p-NO2-Bn-NOTA, and p-NO2-Bn-DOTA all cleared through the kidneys. While there was no statistical difference in the biodistribution results of (68)Ga-radiolabeled p-NO2-Bn-PCTA and p-NO2-Bn-DOTA, (68)Ga-radiolabeled p-NO2-Bn-NOTA cleared more rapidly from blood and muscle tissue but retained at up to 5 times higher activity in the kidneys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it