Comparative study of satellite sequences and phylogeny of five species from the genus <i>Palorus</i> (Insecta, Coleoptera)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Major satellite sequences are analysed in the three tenebrionid beetles Palorus cerylonoides, P. genalis, and P. ficicola, and compared with the ones from P. ratzeburgii and P. subdepressus reported elsewhere. All of them are A+T rich, pericentromerically located, and with lengths of about 150 bp, either in the form of monomers or formed by more complex repeating units. A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of Palorus species using the 3' end of the mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase I gene shows that the five Palorus species have been diverging for a considerable amount of evolutionary time, with the pair P. ratzeburgii and P. genalis being the most closely related. Only these two taxa showed some similarity between their respective high-copy-number satellite sequences, while other satellites are mutually unrelated and might have originated independently. However, all the satellites have in common tertiary structure induced by intrinsic DNA curvature, a characteristic which is conserved within the genus. Palorus major satellites were previously detected in the genomes of congeneric species as low-copy-number clusters (Mestrović et al., Mol. Biol. Evol. 15: 1062-1068. 1998). Given the divergences between the analysed species, the substitution rate deduced from high- and low-copy-number repeats is unexpectedly low. The presence of sequence-induced DNA curvature in all Palorus satellites and similar satellite DNAs in the species pair P. ratzeburgii and P. genalis suggest (i) that constraints are at the tertiary structure; and (ii) that the satellite DNA evolutionary turnover can be dependent on the history of the taxa under study, resulting in retention of similar satellites in related taxa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".